Panel vintageSeptember 1, 2026Demonstration data — not live MLS
Parcel
Contact the desk

The 1% rule is a screen, not an analysis

Rent-to-price is the fastest way to cut five hundred listings to fifty. It is close to useless for choosing between two of them, and here is exactly where it breaks.

The 1% rule is a screen, not an analysis — illustrative image

The rule says a rental should produce monthly rent equal to at least 1% of the purchase price. A $300,000 house should rent for $3,000. In most of Phoenix in 2026, almost nothing does.

The rule is not wrong. It is a filter with a specific and useful property: it needs only two numbers, both of which are on the listing, so it can be applied to a whole market in one pass. That is its entire job.

The four things it cannot see

  • Property tax. A Mesa asset and a Buckeye asset at the same price and rent carry effective rates of roughly 0.52% and 0.66%. That is about $470 a year of NOI difference on a $340,000 property, invisible to rent-to-price.
  • Insurance. A pool adds roughly $420 a year to a policy and about $960 a year in service. A mapped flood zone adds a required separate policy.
  • HOA. A $185 monthly association fee is $2,220 a year of fixed expense that exists whether or not the unit is occupied. Two identical rent-to-price ratios, one with an HOA, are not the same deal.
  • Condition. A 2004 house with all-original mechanicals and a 2020 house with none due carry very different reserve requirements, and the ratio is blind to both.

What the ratio is genuinely good for

Ranking within a single product type and submarket, where the invisible variables are roughly constant. Comparing two 3/2 houses four streets apart, rent-to-price is a fine first cut.

Detecting mispricing. A row well above its submarket’s rent-to-price median is either a data error, a condition problem, or a genuinely interesting listing — and finding out which one takes ten minutes rather than an hour.

Talking about a market quickly. "Nothing in this submarket clears 0.7%" is a useful sentence.

The rule of thumb we actually use

Screen on rent-to-price to get from a market to a shortlist. Rank the shortlist on cap rate, because that carries the expense structure. Decide on DSCR and cash-on-cash, because those carry the financing, and financing is where a deal is actually won or lost in this rate environment.

Three different metrics for three different jobs. Using one of them for all three is the mistake.

Not investment, tax or legal advice. All returns shown are estimates produced by a model from assumptions you can change, not offers, appraisals or guarantees. Real results differ. Consult your own licensed advisers before acting.

More notes

  • Negative leverage, and the one number that predicts it

    If the cap rate is below the mortgage constant, borrowing makes the return worse. Here is how to compute the threshold in ten seconds, and what it means for a Phoenix panel in 2026.

  • What a Phoenix condenser actually costs you

    Cooling equipment in this climate is a twelve-to-sixteen year asset, not a twenty-year one. That difference is worth about half a point of cap rate on older stock, and most screens ignore it entirely.

  • Water allocation is a discount-rate question

    Colorado River and Central Arizona Project allocation will not change what a Phoenix rental earns next quarter. Over a fifteen-year hold on the metro’s growth edge, it is one of the few genuinely structural risks worth pricing.